Cet encart de quelques lignes ayant pour propos « la justice » se propage sur le web, nous avons décidé de vous le divulguer plus bas.
Son titre troublant (Musk’s X fined $350,000 in U.S. fight over Trump records) est sans ambages.
Sachez que l’éditorialiste (présenté sous la signature d’anonymat
) est connu et fiable.
La crédibilité est ainsi grande en ce qui concerne cet article.
Le post a été publié à une date notée 2023-08-09 13:35:00.
L’article :
Twitter, now rebranded as X, was fined $350,000 for failing to immediately comply with a Justice Department search warrant for records related to former President Trump’s account, according to a court opinion unsealed on Wednesday.
Special counsel Jack Smith’s office had obtained a search warrant for data and other records related to Trump’s @realDonaldTrump account in mid-January, according to the opinion. It asked for the nondisclosure order, arguing that revealing the warrant to Trump “would seriously jeopardize the ongoing investigation” by giving him an opportunity to destroy evidence or otherwise change his behavior.
Smith is leading the prosecution of Trump over his efforts to overturn the result of the 2020 presidential election.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit rejected Twitter’s objections to an order that prohibited the company from notifying anyone about the warrant. The opinion shows that Twitter ultimately did comply with the warrant, which related to Smith’s criminal investigation.
The fight had unfolded largely in secret court proceedings until Wednesday, when the D.C. Circuit ordered a redacted version of its July 18 opinion unsealed. The ruling shows that a three-judge panel unanimously upheld the civil contempt sanction as well as a lower court judge’s ruling keeping the nondisclosure order in place.
A spokesperson for Smith declined to comment on the opinion.
Twitter had argued that the nondisclosure order violated the 1st Amendment’s free speech protections, and that it shouldn’t have to comply with the warrant until that issue was fully litigated. A district court judge ruled against the company and ordered Twitter to comply by Feb. 7. Twitter missed that deadline and didn’t produce the records until the evening of Feb. 9, triggering the monetary sanctions.
The D.C. Circuit panel featured Judges Nina Pillard, who was appointed by former President Obama, and Judges J. Michelle Childs and Florence Pan, who were appointed by President Biden. Pan wrote the opinion.
Parutions sur un objet analogue:
À la découverte de la justice pénale,Le livre .
La justice française : acteurs, fonctionnement et médias,Clicker Ici . Disponible dans toutes les bonnes bibliothèques de votre département.
Sociologie des institutions/Les institutions administratives/La sociologie du conseil d’état,Le livre .
La chronique est reproduite de la façon la plus correcte qui soit. Pour émettre des observations sur ce dossier sur le sujet « Librairie juridique » merci de contacter les coordonnées indiquées sur notre site web. Ce paragraphe concernant le thème « Librairie juridique » a été trié sur le net par les spécialistes de la rédaction de jurilivres.com. Le but de jurilivres.com étant de trier en ligne des articles sur le thème de Librairie juridique et les diffuser en s’assurant de répondre au mieux aux interrogations des internautes. Sous peu, nous lancerons d’autres informations pertinentes autour du sujet « Librairie juridique ». Cela dit, visitez de façon régulière notre site.
